surrender, monkey
oh, mittens (as wonkette calls him), you didn’t really say this, did you?
If I fight on in my campaign, all the way to the convention, I would forestall the launch of a national campaign and make it more likely that Senator Clinton or Obama would win. And in this time of war, I simply cannot let my campaign, be a part of aiding a surrender to terror.
wow.
let’s forget for the moment his claim that he’s patriotically ending his campaign to forestall a dangerous, nay, disastrous loss of republican leadership for the country, rather than his own utter lack of appeal. instead, let’s just rejoice in the level of discourse that our great nation takes part in, politically. it’s no longer a matter of whether or not we agree or disagree; we either agree, or we’re actively inviting osama bin laden to trade his cave for the oval office.
i mean, right now, i think that hillary clinton could guarantee herself a trip to the white house by walking up to good ol’ willard, and punching him in the face. i really think that even ann coulter would say, ‘you go, girl’ if that happened and we’d all hold hands and dance on his impeccably-coiffed head.
this is one of those things that makes you just grunt and gasp for words that are adequate to explain precisely how insulting it is on too many levels to count. using similar leaps of logic, just because i don’t care for the patriots, does that mean i’ve turned my back on the red sox as well? if you think lindsay lohan is unattractive, does that make you gay? is opposition to waterboarding the same thing as being in favor of aromatherapy massage for terrorists?
now it’s incorrect to say that nuance is dead in republican politics. however, i did hear that reason, factual details, and shades of gray were all declared enemy combatants, and are presently being held in guantanamo.
